home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- Subject: Large reward for substantial evidence
- Date: 16 Jan 1995 20:33:42 -0500
- Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
- Lines: 23
- Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
- Message-ID: <3ff6pm$ckr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- Reply-To: docscott95@aol.com (DOCSCOTT95)
-
- Just a thought: There has been much talk about motivations to keep actual
- concrete evidence (e.g., actual alien craft, bodies, official documents
- and/or pictures, etc.) secret, out of the hands of the public. Reasons
- that I have seen discussed in the media and on Internet have ranged from
- 1) retro engineering efforts to ultimately attain a military advantage on
- the rest of the world; 2) fear that such information might disrupt
- society/civilization (see Brookings Institute paper circa 1960); 3) fear
- of personal ramifications if individuals involved in maintaining secrecy
- actually came forward with concrete evidence (particularly financial and
- legal ramifications). I wonder what would happen if a large financial
- reward (ostensibly offered by several combined commercial sources that
- would retain the rights to such evidence) were made available for an
- individual or individuals who came forth with the concrete UFO evidence
- that is often alluded to on alt.paranet.ufo. Stated a different way, how
- much would it cost to induce someone "in the know" who has access to such
- evidence to take the chance of prosecution (and also reap a massive
- financial reward in the many millions) and bring forth this evidence to
- the public. I would be interested in any thoughts that any of you may
- have on this subject. Another thought: If the Zapruder film (of JFK
- assassination fame) netted Zapruder several hundred grand back in the
- 60's, what do you suppose a piece of alien spaceship, an official autopsy
- picture, an alien corpse, etc. would bring in today's media market?
- SCOTT PARKER
-
-